I opposed Hillary Clinton because she was too old, too experienced and too much part of the Washington establishment. Barack was my guy – and the fact that he was a guy had nothing to do with it. Sure he was young, but that just meant his worldview was fresh, unleavened by cynicism. Hillary was kind of wrinkly. I’m pretty sure she used makeup by the pound; I’ll bet she did Botox on occasion; and I’m sure she dyed her hair.
Barack, on the other hand, was trim and fit, with a firm jaw and, hey, he even looked good in a swimsuit. Sure, he had a thin resume: Community organizer, a state legislator for just seven years and a man who started running for President even before he had won his Senate seat in 2004. So what? The presidency isn’t something handed out to the person with the heaviest resume. It’s about ideas and perspective. It’s about being free of the taint of those Washington lobbyists. And, most importantly, it’s about change. Hillary, a White Housewife for eight years, was part of the problem. Not the George W. Bush problem, mind you, but the change problem. She had lived in Washington. Not only that, but she clearly had enjoyed herself while there. I’m opposed to politicians – even Democrats -- who like Washington. They support national healthcare, higher minimum wages, environmental protection, clean energy and the like. Obama supports those too, of course, as did John Kerry in 2004 and Al Gore in 2000. But the point is, he also cares about change, and while I’m not exactly sure what change means, I know it must be very important.
Moreover, Palin’s got a family: five kids and a newborn with Down’s syndrome who’s just four months old. She can’t be running the country and caring for them at the same time. Where are her priorities? Indeed – and I’m not being sexist here because this comment applies to all people who might get pregnant and not just women – I don’t believe anyone who is pre-menopausal should be permitted to run for higher office. They might have kids and I don’t want their loyalties divided.